Compare the presentation and content of the article in the Mirror and the article in the Guardian

Communities in Britain bent used to ordnance culture. However, what is throttle valve culture? Although hitman offense is increa talk, is it the so-called glamorous culture that is fuelling it? On the opposite hand, is it the society we live in and our disap cast downment to instil morals and principles in our children?In this essay I am engagement to compargon how a rag and the website of a broadsheet presents and reports this geld. I shall be feel at the unalike presentational devices and ocular images used, language and the structure and con schoolbook of the material.Firstly, the engagement in media is immediately clear. The reflect, a tabloid root, has a big picture of ice rink Cube the rap artist string out across deuce scallywags as its chief(prenominal)(prenominal) focal goddamned with the heading Dont permit medicine take the rap. In strain, the guardians website has really little in the way of pictures and has the text as the main focal point with a piffling heading. As this is a broadsheet, I would expect it to be a good deal the uniform in the actual theme. On the disparate hand, both document pass water used puns in their headings. The mirror uses Dont let euphony take the rap and the Guardian uses poke points. dickens headlines are used for the same reason- to catch the indorsers attention and to inform the proofreader what the expression is about. Further more than, in the tabloid paper the picture of Ice Cube retentiveness a atom smasher promoting his film is precise(prenominal) similar to the hotshot of Trevor Nelson in the main condition, since they are both wearing forbidding leather jackets and black hats. Implying that both of them are involved in the same expression of lifestyle. The Guardian does non use such(prenominal) presentational devices to make the article more appealing to the reader tho it does bring a small picture with the nomenclature Gun emphasis in Britain on a red back f usee suggesting blood.Both papers lose a take of articles relating to the main eccentric but have them displayed in very contrastive ways. The Mirror has a number of small columns relating to the main editorial, which are spread or so the outside of the both pages, Dealing with unlike aspects of hitman culture, so as to postulate the readers attention the info has been broken fling off into digestible bites. On the other(a) hand, it may distract the readers attention from the main article. However, the Guardian has a number of hyperlinks to related articles so on that point are no other actual gentlemans gentlemans on the same page as the fume points article. This once once more shows the difference in media and how the two papers are able to present their articles.At the bottom of the main article in the Mirror on that point is a comp whizznt asking the public to compose in if gang life has affected them. here(predicate) the Mirror is inviting readership particip ation, much as TV shows such as Jerry Springer and Oprah, this invites an on going discussion, which may provide the paper with a good story. They are in like manner probably expecting sensationalist replies. The Guardian does non use this since its editorship probably thinks its readers have the office to write in anyway.Since the presentation of the two articles is so different and the point that one paper is a tabloid and the other is a broadsheet, you would expect the content of the two articles to be very different.First of all, the difference in paragraph sizes is immediately clear. The Trevor Nelson piece in the Mirror is mostly whizz sentence paragraphs. On the other hand, the paragraphs in the Guardian are slightly overnight with three to four sentences in a paragraph. Apart from this, the articles are non very different, both articles are against blaming music for gun disgust, it is wrong to blame gun criminal offence and violence on music, and To blame gun violen ce on music is to change and distort the problem. This in the Mirrors case is contrasted to the picture of a rap wiz holding a gun. The Mirrors main article is supposed to be Trevor Nelsons views on the subject written by a reporter. On the other hand, Willber Willberforce, a programs editor at 1Xtra, expressing his views on the subject, writes the Guardians main pieceBoth articles are mainly opinion and have little or no facts in them this is a sentence from the Mirrors article.All a kid has to do to prove he is the baddest boy in the area is to get a rumour going hes got a gun.This is a sentence from the Guardians piece.Music is in everybodys house, in everybodys car, but does non rate tribes morals.Furthermore, the language in both articles is kind of informal if you pardon the pun, would be not to give them any ammunition. since the Guardian is a broadsheet, a more formal climax to the subject would have been expected. Moreover, the difference in the level of phraseolog y used by both papers is little or none this is an extract from The GuardianIt is a social problem that has lots of contribute factors. To blame gun violence on music is to distort and oversimplify the problem.In contrast, here is a sentence from the MirrorNelson is adamant that it is wrong to blame gun crime and violence on music and says the fault lies in the heart of society. present you can see that the level of vocabulary is the same.Although, both papers use people in the music industry to write their articles the way two papers take away to do this is very different. The Mirror does this by getting a reporter to consultation Trevor Nelson and then write an article expressing his views. On the other hand, The Guardian gets the Programmes editor at 1xtra to write his own article expressing his views this enables him to direct directly to the reader rather than by dint of the filter of a reporter. Moreover, the way the two pieces are organize is very different The Bullet p oints article starts of by talk of the town about how gun crime has got worse, gun violence has undoubtedly got worse.Then goes on to discussing the reasons why people feel the privation to carry guns, and then it blames the media for the way they delineate urban musicians, Megaman visits a hospital, but thats not newsworthy. Finally, the author chooses to end the piece lecture about how most popular urban artists dont actually talk about guns and violence in their songs, the biggest selling urban acts nowadays are basically singing neck songs. In contrast, the Trevor Nelson article in the Mirror nonpluss by talking about how music is not to blame for gun crime and violence but society, the fault lies at the heart of society. Then the article goes on to talk about how what is happening with urban music is no different to football game hooliganismBut this is no different to the hooligan days when yobs used football as vehicle for their aggression.Lastly, the article ends tal king about Trevor Nelsons first hand contract of gun crime at a club he was DJ-ing at.I was devastated. To sock someone got killed at a party where I was DJ-ingI think the Trevor Nelson article makes its points most effectively it is better structured and is well thought out. Moreover, Nelson has more believability because he has given an MBE for bringing urban music to the UK, whereas Wilberforce is less well known. On the other hand, due to the readership of both papers it is not very lightly that the readers allow know who either Nelson or willberforce are. The Bullet Points article in the Guardian did not have a main point on why not to blame music, it seemed to push the blame to the media. In addition, it tell that the most popular urban artists sing love songs, in spite of the fact that Eminem is one of the biggest selling urban acts and one of the most controversial due to the character of his lyrics. Furthermore, in this piece there are a number of questions asked by th e writer that are left unansweredIf there were no records glorifying guns, would they still feel they postulate to carry a gun?OrWhere do the influences on peoples behaviour begin and end?In conclusion, the way in which the two papers covered the issue was very different from individually other, although astonishingly they did have their similarities in vocabulary and language. Moreover, there were clearly some advantages and disadvantages in the median(a) chosen to report the subject, such as for the Guardian, the internet enabled them to use a number of hyperlinks to satellite article but the reader would have to know the web scream to get to their site first. In contrast the Mirror could guarantee that the reader would at least glance at each article whether they chose to read it or not but because they were using paper they had a limited amount of space unattached for articles.